Sunday, November 23, 2014

Do we benefit from GPS?

(Photo from: brandsoftheworld.com)
GPS is a convenient service, but do we actually benefit from it?
GPS was not a popular service when it was first released. It was not until later, when people started to link GPS to maps, then GPS started to catch on. There are many benefits to using GPS. It helps people save a lot of time from studying the map trying to figure out where they are when they are completely clueless as to where they really are. However, the one drawback from this service is that people started to over relying on GPS for directions to places. We are used to GPS taking us to places and no longer keep a map or study the map before we go on the road. This may be a very dangerous practice because when we are both unfamiliar with the roads and conditions and distracted from GPS's navigator, it is harder to avoid any unexpected conditions in front of the road.
Speaking of possible accidents ahead of the road, GPS could be useful when accidents happen. There have been many stories in which GPS was the key to helping people out of a bad situation, such as abduction and hiking accidents. GPS allowed police officers and firefighters to respond to the scene more efficient because it cuts down the investigation time when they are provided with close locations of the victims. Often times, police officers and firefighters are able to rush to the scene just in time to save the victims. However, this raises the question that if officials should have access to these supposedly "private" locations. We question if hackers and people who intend to commit a crime would be able to take advantage of this service and commit crimes at an ease.

One example of employers and employees' dispute to install GPS in cars is driver companies. Some employers install GPS into employees cars without the drivers' consent. Employers argued that employees waived their tracking rights when they enter the company. Employers also argued that those data are simply used to protect their employees by directing them away from potential dangers ahead of them, or to avoid traffic. Employers benefit from this service because they are able to keep track of their employees and achieve the most efficient performance possible. On the other hand, employees argued that their location is their privacy and employers do not have the right to these information. They also argued GPS tracking threatens their jobs, because GPS data may be affected by weather conditions or other situations that cause false reports, which employers may used against them and fire them.

Another commonly used function of GPS is to track the elderly or people with dementia. Caregivers give these people GPS so they could easily track down where they are. Although in a sense that it helps protect these people from going to dangerous places or forgetting how to get back home, there is also the concern that caregivers might limit these people's whereabouts. Caregivers might use GPS data to prevent these people from going to places where they rated as "dangerous", which violates their freedom.

Although GPS definitely proved to have benefited people in some ways, it also presented some drawbacks with using the technology. This shows that we need to use GPS with caution so that the technology does not become our tripping stone. 

4 comments:

  1. The downsides that you mentioned for GPS are quite interesting and insightful. Do you think the negative aspects of GPS outweighs those of the positives? Particularly for the one regarding tracking the elderly or those with dementia, isn't the potential restriction of freedom ultimately meant solely for safety and protection?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I actually couldn't decide which one stood out to me the most. However, the elder case in particular, for me, I think freedom outweighs safety. This saying only applies to this case though, because if freedom means harming another, then that's another story. I think life is about adventures, and taking away that little freedom that these people have in their lives would pretty much be torturing to them. If let's say they only have one day of life left, I would rather them accomplish whatever they want in that last day than having them protected. But, that's just what I think, in this particular elders and dementia patients case.

      Delete
    2. Nice, I really like your perspective on life! Haha I guess the best case scenario would be to allow for freedom to explore while maintaining safety as well.

      Delete
  2. I think the use of GPS has grown dramatically over the last 10 years, and that the world probably can't live without it. I'm interested to see whether you focus on more traditional uses of GPS such as for police officers and firefighters, or on the more recent issue of tracking smartphones. The ethical issues are similar, but the solutions to those issues are likely to be very different.

    ReplyDelete